Center for Collaborative Education logo         Linda Nathan, Principal of the Boston Arts Academy
           

CCE Home

CCESSN Home

Concept

Design Summary

Implementation

Supporting Data

Districts and Schools

Resources

Search Our Site or the Web


CCE Small Schools Network:
The Concept

The Need for Small Schools

A growing body of research and evidence indicates that large, comprehensive schools, especially those serving high percentages of low-income students and students of color, need a radical overhaul if they are to be successful in raising and sustaining achievement for all students. Most schools are too large and impersonal to engage many students. Secondary students generally have seven to eight classes per day, all disconnected from one another and all with different teachers who each teach 100-150 students, making it virtually impossible for a teacher to know students well. With the nation’s population growing increasingly diverse, our schools are leaving many of its students behind.

Gathering evidence indicates that school size affects student performance, particularly the performance of low-income students and students of color. Small schools are a powerful antidote to the failures of our nation’s large, comprehensive schools. Besides the educational benefits of small schools, recent research challenges the notion that large schools are cost-efficient. A 1999 study on high school size in New York City found that, examining cost per graduate, “small academic and large high schools are similar in terms of budgets per graduate….Because the literature on school size indicates that small high schools are more effective for minority and poor students, the similarity in [financial costs]… suggests that policy makers might do well to support the creation of more small high schools.” (Stiefel, Berne, Iatarola, and Fruchter, 1999). Factoring in that high school dropouts add significantly higher future costs to society through increased crime, prison, and welfare rates and lower voter participation rates, the economic argument in favor of large schools becomes even less credible.

What CES/CCESSN Provides to Project Districts and Schools

The New England Small Schools Network works intensively with seven school districts to create 35 new small schools over the next five years, with the goal of successfully raising student achievement and closing the learning gap for under-served students. For these districts and schools, CES/CCESSN is providing the following services:

  • Visits to an Established Small School. Each new small school visits existing CCESSN small schools in a mentoring relationship.
  • Technical Assistance and Coaching from CES/CCESSN Staff. CES/CCESSN staff provide assistance in all areas of small schools development – breaking large schools down into smaller schools, budgeting, staff selection, governance, curriculum, instruction, assessment, school culture, and family involvement. In addition, CES/CCESSN staff work with each new district to negotiate terms of the new small school(s), determine how to grant conditions of autonomy to the school(s), develop public relations messages to build community support for small schools, and redirect support and professional development to better support small schools.
  • Summer Institutes and School Year Network Meetings. CES/CCESSN conducts an annual summer, week-long Small Schools Design Institute for all project districts and schools, which focuses on all aspects of small schools design and district support. In addition, CES/CCESSN conducts a week-long Critical Friends Group Facilitator training, professional development days on using CCESSN autonomies and CES principles to improve teaching and learning, and visits to successful small schools.
  • Funding. Each new small school receives planning and professional development funds, spread over four years.
  • Access to a Pool of New Small School Leaders. Selected schools have access to new small school leaders who are educated through the Center for Collaborative Education’s Principal Residency Network, an apprenticeship model of principal preparation and credentialing. All CCESSN districts receive ongoing leadership development within the districts.

Working with Other Districts and Schools

In addition, CES/CCESSN is available to contract with other districts to assist them in creating new freestanding small schools or to convert large schools to house multiple small schools. We look for districts to be committed to the following characteristics in order to work with them:

Characteristics of Schools
We recommend that:
  • All schools embrace the CES/CCESSN principles or a set of comparable principles.
  • Schools be schools of choice for students, parents, and teachers, and that schools have proportionate enrollments to the district by race, income, and gender.
  • Teaching and learning be personalized, with student-teacher loads greatly reduced so that all faculty know their students well, with secondary loads at no more than 80:1 and elementary loads at no more than 20:1.
  • Instruction (student-as-worker), curriculum (less is more and students learning to use their minds well), and assessment (demonstration of mastery through exhibitions) reflect the CES/CCESSN principles.
  • For high schools, the proposed grade span of all new small schools be at least four years, and for middle schools at least three years.
  • All proposed new small schools contain between 50-400 students.

District Commitments and Requirements

We recommend that:

  • All proposed new small schools have identified and secured long-term facilities.
  • Districts commit to providing the CCESSN Conditions of Autonomy (full explanation) to the proposed new small schools in some fashion. The autonomies include: Staffing, Budget, Curriculum and Assessment, Governance, and the School Calendar.
   
© 2004 Center for Collaborative Education
Comments: info@ccebos.org
CCE Home